Original Article

Evaluation of Heart Rate Variability by Smartphone App Using Pulse Photoplethysmography in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) correlates with localized myocardial ischemia and predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including sudden cardiac death, non-sudden cardiac death, and noncardiac death. Photoplethysmography (PPG) measurements demonstrate good agreement with ECG for time-domain HRV indices. In this study, HRV was measured via smartphone PPG, focusing on standard deviation of all normal RR (NN) intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD)—parameters recognized for their low error and recommended for clinical use.
Methods: This cross-sectional case-control study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam. HRV indices (SDNN and rMSSD) were measured for 2 minutes using a camera-based PPG smartphone application. Clinical data were collected at admission. Linear and logistic regression analyses assessed associations between HRV, AMI status, and clinical severity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis evaluated diagnostic performance.
Results: A total of 101 patients with AMI and 121 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were included. The AMI group exhibited significantly lower HRV indices, with a mean SDNN of 20.63 ±10.16 ms and rMSSD of 23.67±12.38 ms, compared with 33.99±11.72 ms (SDNN) and 35.9 ±16.21 ms (rMSSD) in the control group (P <0.001 for both). An SDNN cutoff of ≤21.35 ms yielded an area under the curve of 0.832, with a sensitivity of 87.6% and specificity of 62.4% for identifying AMI. Lower HRV was also significantly associated with higher clinical severity indicators, including reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, Killip class II-IV, regional wall motion abnormalities, and multivessel coronary artery disease.
Conclusions: The use of camera-based HRV smartphone applications to measure short-term SDNN and rMSSD may serve as a novel digital health tool to improve the detection of coronary artery disease, particularly AMI, given its simplicity and noninvasive nature.

1. Song T, Qu XF, Zhang YT, Cao W, Han BH, Li Y, et al. Usefulness of the heart-rate variability complex for predicting cardiac mortality after acute myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14:59.
2. Lin TT, Yang WS, Hsieh MY, Wu CC, Lin LY. Deterioration of Deceleration Capacity of Heart Rate is Associated with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in End-Stage Renal Disease Population. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018;34(3):242-50.
3. Johnston BW, Barrett-Jolley R, Krige A, Welters ID. Heart rate variability: Measurement and emerging use in critical care medicine. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020;21(2):148-57.
4. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, Jr., Moss AJ. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59(4):256-62.
5. Selvaraj N, Jaryal A, Santhosh J, Deepak KK, Anand S. Assessment of heart rate variability derived from finger-tip photoplethysmography as compared to electrocardiography. J Med Eng Technol. 2008;32(6):479-84.
6. Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28(3):R1-39.
7. Almarshad MA, Islam MS, Al-Ahmadi S, BaHammam AS. Diagnostic Features and Potential Applications of PPG Signal in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(3).
8. Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M, Wood M, Kilding AE, Laursen PB. Comparison of Heart-Rate-Variability Recording With Smartphone Photoplethysmography, Polar H7 Chest Strap, and Electrocardiography. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(10):1324-8.
9. Thayer JF, Hansen AL, Saus-Rose E, Johnsen BH. Heart rate variability, prefrontal neural function, and cognitive performance: the neurovisceral integration perspective on self-regulation, adaptation, and health. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(2):141-53.
10. Rajendra Acharya U, Paul Joseph K, Kannathal N, Lim CM, Suri JS. Heart rate variability: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44(12):1031-51.
11. Xhyheri B, Manfrini O, Mazzolini M, Pizzi C, Bugiardini R. Heart rate variability today. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;55(3):321-31.
12. Lippman N, Stein KM, Lerman BB. Comparison of methods for removal of ectopy in measurement of heart rate variability. Am J Physiol. 1994;267(1 Pt 2):H411-8.
13. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165.
14. Casolo GC, Stroder P, Signorini C, Calzolari F, Zucchini M, Balli E, et al. Heart rate variability during the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1992;85(6):2073-9.
15. Fang SC, Wu YL, Tsai PS. Heart Rate Variability and Risk of All-Cause Death and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. Biol Res Nurs. 2020;22(1):45-56.
16. Lu G, Yang F, Taylor JA, Stein JF. A comparison of photoplethysmography and ECG recording to analyse heart rate variability in healthy subjects. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(8):634-41.
17. Natarajan A, Pantelopoulos A, Emir-Farinas H, Natarajan P. Heart rate variability with photoplethysmography in 8 million individuals: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(12):e650-e7.
18. Pivatelli FC, Dos Santos MA, Fernandes GB, Gatti M, de Abreu LC, Valenti VE, et al. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of linear and nonlinear indices of heart rate variability in stable angina patients. Int Arch Med. 2012;5(1):31.
19. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043-65.
20. Capilupi MJ, Kerath SM, Becker LB. Vagus Nerve Stimulation and the Cardiovascular System. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(2).
21. Goldenberg I, Goldkorn R, Shlomo N, Einhorn M, Levitan J, Kuperstein R, et al. Heart Rate Variability for Risk Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia in Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease: The HRV-DETECT (Heart Rate Variability for the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia) Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(24):e014540.
22. Brinza C, Floria M, Covic A, Covic A, Scripcariu DV, Burlacu A. The Usefulness of Assessing Heart Rate Variability in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (HeaRt-V-AMI). Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(9).
23. Abdelnabi M, Zaki M, Sadaka M, Nawar M. The effects of clinical and angiographic aspects of coronary artery disease on the cardiac autonomic function: a single-center prospective cohort study. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;11(3):410-20.
Files
IssueVol 20 No 1 (2025) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v20i1.19220
Keywords
Heart Rate Variability Photoplethysmography Smartphone Acute Myocardial Infarction
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Hoang Anh T, Tran Long N. Evaluation of Heart Rate Variability by Smartphone App Using Pulse Photoplethysmography in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Res Heart Yield Transl Med. 2025;20(1):37-46.